adornment
<email deleted> on Saturday, January 4, 2003 at 12:16:29 comments: I just noticed that, while wearing a -1 ring of adornment, a potion of enlightenment gave the intrinsic "You are adorned." Shouldn't it be more accurately, "You are unadorned." or something similar?
This commit is contained in:
@@ -937,7 +937,16 @@ int final; /* 0 => still in progress; 1 => over, survived; 2 => dead */
|
|||||||
if (u.umconf) you_are("going to confuse monsters");
|
if (u.umconf) you_are("going to confuse monsters");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*** Appearance and behavior ***/
|
/*** Appearance and behavior ***/
|
||||||
if (Adornment) you_are("adorned");
|
if (Adornment) {
|
||||||
|
int adorn = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if(uleft && uleft->otyp == RIN_ADORNMENT) adorn += uleft->spe;
|
||||||
|
if(uright && uright->otyp == RIN_ADORNMENT) adorn += uright->spe;
|
||||||
|
if (adorn < 0)
|
||||||
|
you_are("poorly adorned");
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
you_are("adorned");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
if (Invisible) you_are("invisible");
|
if (Invisible) you_are("invisible");
|
||||||
else if (Invis) you_are("invisible to others");
|
else if (Invis) you_are("invisible to others");
|
||||||
/* ordinarily "visible" is redundant; this is a special case for
|
/* ordinarily "visible" is redundant; this is a special case for
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user