From 5b27e25d6d96345d12cbd19b153f6e57c227032f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: nhmall <nhmall@nethack.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 16:31:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] avoid a warning on x ? :

Surround the code to the left of the '?' in the DESTROY_ARM(o) macro
with () to quiet a warning on each use of the macro.
---
 src/do_wear.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/do_wear.c b/src/do_wear.c
index 37b6fcd79..5a9c4a237 100644
--- a/src/do_wear.c
+++ b/src/do_wear.c
@@ -2945,10 +2945,10 @@ destroy_arm(register struct obj *atmp)
      * artifact suit over a shirt.  That would be a bug.  Since there
      * aren't any, we'll just look the other way.
      */
-#define DESTROY_ARM(o)                            \
-    ((otmp = (o)) != 0 && (!atmp || atmp == otmp) \
-             && (!obj_resists(otmp, 0, 90))       \
-         ? (otmp->in_use = TRUE)                  \
+#define DESTROY_ARM(o)                             \
+    (((otmp = (o)) != 0 && (!atmp || atmp == otmp) \
+             && (!obj_resists(otmp, 0, 90)))       \
+         ? (otmp->in_use = TRUE)                   \
          : FALSE)
 
     if (DESTROY_ARM(uarmc)) {