function pointer assignment warnings in VC2005

The latest Micrsoft compilers complain when a function is
assigned to a function pointer, and the function's argument
list does not match the prototype precisely.
It was evem complaining about the difference between this:
     int x()
     {
        [...]
     }
and a prototype of
     int x(void);
when assigning that function's address to a function pointer.

This quiets those warnings, without suppressing the mismatch
check altogether for more serious mismatches.
This commit is contained in:
nethack.allison
2006-06-25 19:54:31 +00:00
parent c374583632
commit d09c374239
11 changed files with 109 additions and 91 deletions

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* SCCS Id: @(#)lock.c 3.5 2006/01/02 */
/* SCCS Id: @(#)lock.c 3.5 2006/06/25 */
/* Copyright (c) Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1985. */
/* NetHack may be freely redistributed. See license for details. */
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ lock_action()
STATIC_PTR
int
picklock() /* try to open/close a lock */
picklock(VOID_ARGS) /* try to open/close a lock */
{
if (xlock.box) {
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ picklock() /* try to open/close a lock */
STATIC_PTR
int
forcelock() /* try to force a locked chest */
forcelock(VOID_ARGS) /* try to force a locked chest */
{
register struct obj *otmp;