This is from the pull request for the assertion failure fix. It
did not mention how to reproduce the assertion failure, just added
casts to a bunch of isspace/isprint/tolower calls that didn't already
have such.
I removed an obsolete change for win/tty/topl.c and changed the
win/win32/mswproc.c code to avoid using an expression with side-effects
(*colorstring++) in calls to tolower() in case someone overrides that
with a macro which evaluates its argument more than once as some pre-
ANSI ones used to do. Not tested, might have typos....
sys/wince/*.c still needs similar casts.
FDECL(foo, (boolean)) ought to have been using (BOOLEAN_P), but
the tiles code isn't including the header which defines that, so
change the argument to int.
Changes to be committed:
modified: win/share/other.txt
modified: win/share/tilemap.c
modified: win/share/tiletext.c
On 2/2/2016 7:27 AM, paxed wrote:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/nethack/comments/43n8i2/can_anyone_tell_me_what_these_zigzag_tiles_are/
>
> Looks like the tiles in question have been labeled as "wall" since
> 3.4.3 at least
>
Put better labels on the 'other' tileset and accept those
labels in the tile processing utilities.
I'll push a formatting guide at some point. There may still be
outstanding changes, but please feel free to resolve those as you arrive
a them.
To the best of my knowledge, there is no changes to the actual code
content, but the formatter does have the occasional bug. If you run into
an issue, please fix it!
keni