<Someone> wrote:
> From the mkclass() comments:
>
> /* Assumption #2: monsters of a given class are presented in ascending
> * order of strength.
> */
>
> And monst.c:
>
> * Rule #2: monsters of a given class are presented in ascending
> * order of strength.
>
> * Rule #4: monster subclasses (e.g. giants) should be kept
> * together, unless it violates Rule 2. NOGEN monsters
> * won't violate Rule 2.
>
> Inspecting my monster-difficulty spoiler, I see the following places
> that these precepts are violated: do they cause potential problems?
> (Insofar as occasionally incorrectly miscalculating the probabilities
> for monster generation is a "problem", that is...)
>
> SPECIES DIF
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
> d dog 5
> d large dog 7
> d dingo 5
>
> d warg 8
> d winter wolf cub 7
> d winter wolf 9
>
> u white unicorn 6
> u gray unicorn 6
> u black unicorn 6
> u pony 4
>
> H frost giant 13
> H storm giant 19
> H ettin 13
>
> P black pudding 12
> P green slime 8
>
> S pit viper 9
> S python 8
> S cobra 10
>
> Z giant zombie 9
> Z ghoul 5
>
> @ nurse 13
> @ soldier 8
> @ sergeant 10
>
> & horned devil 9
> & succubus 8
>
> & balrog 20
> & sandestin 15
>
> (I've just realised that these may have already been fixed, and
> waiting on a file-compatibility-breaking release; if so, ignore me :-)
1c326a95e1