fix typos
This commit is contained in:
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ pick_pick(struct obj *obj)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
Decide whether two unpaid items are mergable; caller is responsible for
|
||||
Decide whether two unpaid items are mergeable; caller is responsible for
|
||||
making sure they're unpaid and the same type of object; we check the price
|
||||
quoted by the shopkeeper and also that they both belong to the same shk.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ obfree(struct obj *obj, struct obj *merge)
|
||||
if (!merge) {
|
||||
bp->useup = 1;
|
||||
obj->unpaid = 0; /* only for doinvbill */
|
||||
/* for used up glob, put back origial weight in case it gets
|
||||
/* for used up glob, put back original weight in case it gets
|
||||
formatted ('I x' or itemized billing) with 'wizweight' On */
|
||||
if (obj->globby && !obj->owt && has_omid(obj))
|
||||
obj->owt = OMID(obj);
|
||||
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ dopay(void)
|
||||
/* allow 'm p' to request a menu for menustyle:traditional;
|
||||
for other styles, it will do the opposite; that doesn't make
|
||||
a whole lot of sense for a 'request-menu' prefix, but otherwise
|
||||
it would simply be reduncant and there wouldn't be any way to
|
||||
it would simply be redundant and there wouldn't be any way to
|
||||
skip the menu when hero owes for multiple items */
|
||||
if (iflags.menu_requested)
|
||||
via_menu = !via_menu;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user