clear_bypasses() comment

While looking at clear_bypasses() I noticed some excluded code [#if 0]
which could be risky to include, so update the comment there.  Also,
excluded code tends to need formatting fix-up.
This commit is contained in:
PatR
2015-10-18 17:29:19 -07:00
parent fb14c41bd4
commit ab5cafaa62

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
/* NetHack 3.6 worn.c $NHDT-Date: 1432512772 2015/05/25 00:12:52 $ $NHDT-Branch: master $:$NHDT-Revision: 1.44 $ */
/* NetHack 3.6 worn.c $NHDT-Date: 1445214551 2015/10/19 00:29:11 $ $NHDT-Branch: master $:$NHDT-Revision: 1.45 $ */
/* Copyright (c) Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1985. */
/* NetHack may be freely redistributed. See license for details. */
@@ -691,17 +691,19 @@ clear_bypasses()
if (otmp->bypass) {
otmp->bypass = 0;
/* bypass will have inhibited any stacking, but since it's
used for polymorph handling, the objects here probably
have been transformed and won't be stacked in the usual
manner afterwards; so don't bother with this */
* used for polymorph handling, the objects here probably
* have been transformed and won't be stacked in the usual
* manner afterwards; so don't bother with this.
* [Changing the fobj chain mid-traversal would also be risky.]
*/
#if 0
if (objects[otmp->otyp].oc_merge) {
xchar ox, oy;
if (objects[otmp->otyp].oc_merge) {
xchar ox, oy;
(void) get_obj_location(otmp, &ox, &oy, 0);
stack_object(otmp);
newsym(ox, oy);
}
(void) get_obj_location(otmp, &ox, &oy, 0);
stack_object(otmp);
newsym(ox, oy);
}
#endif /*0*/
}
}