From the newsgroup: you weren't charged anything if you broke the
lock of a box or chest which was owned by a shop. Force the hero to pay
for the damaged container; any contents remain owned by the shop and don't
affect the cost of the forced purchase. This existing entry in fixes35.0
is adequate to cover the fix:
various actions--such as enchanting--performed on an unpaid shop object
either force the hero to buy the item (when its value is lowered) or
increase the current bill (when its value is raised)
Change safe_qbuf() so that instead of picking one of three strings
for sprintf() to plug into a prompt string, it actually constructs the
full prompt string itself. Also pass in the unformatted object and a pair
of formatting functions instead of performing dual formatting in advance.
The actual formatting is done via new routine short_oname() which also
takes an object and a pair of formatting routines plus a target length.
It uses the first routine, typically xname() or doname(), and formats the
object, then if the result is too long it makes some transformations, and
tries again. If truncating "called foo" and "named bar" down to 12 chars
and omitting "uncursed, rustproof, thoroughly corroded" attributes still
result in a string that's too long, it uses the other formatting routine.
The latter calls one of several jacket routines around simple_typename()
to produce a short result.
This has been through about four incarnations now and has gotten a
bit less testing each time, but I need to get it in place before I end up
running out of gas and abandoning it. I've got some changes to shk.c
(where safe_qbuf is needed but not currently used) that now need to be
redone and will come eventually.
The latest Micrsoft compilers complain when a function is
assigned to a function pointer, and the function's argument
list does not match the prototype precisely.
It was evem complaining about the difference between this:
int x()
{
[...]
}
and a prototype of
int x(void);
when assigning that function's address to a function pointer.
This quiets those warnings, without suppressing the mismatch
check altogether for more serious mismatches.
<email deleted> wrote:
> BUGS TO REPORT:
>
> * Zapping a wand of locking at an open door with an object on it probably
> shouldn't give a "Something's in the way." message - especially if the wand is
> unidentified.
avoid "Something's in the way" message with unidentified wand of locking
From a bug report: dwarvish mattock was
subject to breaking when attempting to force a lock, because it is treated
as a bladed weapon. So is pick-axe; they're both defined as blunt (WHACK
attack mode), but the definition of is_blade() erroneously includes them
since P_PICK_AXE falls between P_DAGGER and P_SABER. That skill should be
renumbered, but I haven't investigated what else might happen when that's
done so this fix uses a special case instead.
I noticed that there was an unnecessary old check for rubber hose;
it's excluded along with whip by the skill > P_LANCE test. When fixing
that up, I realized that the obscure feature of forcing via statue was
broken; it always failed the skill < P_DAGGER test. Also, I took away the
exception for aklys; even though designed as a throwing weapon, it is used
as a club. I wasn't sure about the exception for flail; it is perfectly
capable of bashing things but the code apparently excludes it for use as
a prying implement. Switching its check to P_FLAIL catches grappling hook
along with it.
A post-3.4.3 change dealing with reaching into pits resulted in "you
sit on the air" if you used the #sit command after escaping a pit trap.
Change can_reach_floor() so that caller explicitly controls whether being
on the brink of a pit is a condition that prevents reaching the floor.
This also splits a fairly common message about not being able to reach the
floor into a separate routine.
There is still oddness here: if you're polymorphed into a flyer,
#sit yields "you sit down" followed by "you fly over a pit" (latter occurs
when escaping trap activation). A ceiling hider behaves similarly, but
the second message is "you escape a pit" and doesn't sound quite as silly.
Perhaps #sit should pass TOOKPLUNGE to dotrap(), or maybe there's some
better way to handle this?
[Attention: This patch increments EDITLEVEL in patchlevel.h, rendering all
previous save and bones files obsolete.]
Here's the first cut at the two recommended flags lknown and cknown.
I've attempted to stay close to Pat's recommendations:
"Containers ought to have two new flags: lknown for lock status known,
and cknown for contents known (ie, `secret'). Formatted box and chest
descriptions should include locked/unlocked/broken when that is known
and empty/nonempty (or something like "holds N items") when contents
are known. The contents indicator would also apply to nonlockable
containers."
I probably overlooked a place where a flag should be adjusted, but this
should give us a good starting point.
I wasn't sure what to do with the case of the auditory feedback for
magical locking "Click" and "Clunk". The question that came to my mind
was: Should those reveal the locked or unlocked status of a box?
I suppose if you knew the type of wand you were zapping or the spell
you were casting, you could argue that they should.
In the end, I opted for setting lknown right off the zap/cast effect
for anyone playing a Wizard role, and not setting it for anyone else,
thus advancing class differentiation a little bit too.
I haven't checked the cknown results under all flags.menu_style options
at this point, only MENU_FULL.
+ Separate the two uses of flags.soundok.
+ Player-settable option is now called "acoustics".
+ Deafness is now handled as a full-fledged attribute.
+ Check for deafness in You_hear(), rather than caller.
+ Check for deafness in caller, rather than verbalize(),
because gods can speak to characters in spite of deafness.
+ Since changes are being made to prop.h, reorder it to the
same order as youprop.h and enlightenment.
There are still some extraneous checks and missing checks
for deafness, which will be followed up in a future patch.
Because of the size of this patch and its savefile incompatibilities,
it is only being applied to the trunk code. Portions of this patch
were written by Michael Allison.
Pat Rankin wrote:
> collect them all into some new struct and
> save that separately rather than jamming more non-option stuff
> into struct flags.
This patch:
- collects all context/tracking related fields from flags
into a new structure called "context."
It also adds the following to the new structure:
- stethoscope turn support
- victual support
- tin support
This patch introduces a change to yname() and Yname2() that avoids the
possessive "your" for the hero's normal, fully identified artifacts.
Quest artifacts still get the possessive, as do all other objects and all
objects not in the hero's possession. shk_your()/Shk_Your() are used in
many places with a specific, generalized name for the object, so I didn't
introduce the artifact behavior there, although I did change them to append
a space, which simplified some other code. Through added use of yname(),
there may be some places that used to just say "corpse" that will now be more
descriptive via yname()'s use of cxname(). I'm sure <Someone> will point
out any such places that are too onerous, although nothing obviously is.
I took the opportunity to inspect many uses of "your" and even Your(). Two
new functions are also introduced, yobjnam() and Yobjnam2(), which work
like aobjnam() and yname() combined, because I found that many uses of
aobjnam() were preceeded by "your" and I couldn't generally provide the
desired behavior for artifacts (or future artifacts) without a combined
function. In some cases, this change allowed better sharing of code.
rust_dmg() still takes a string as input which is sometimes initialized
from xname() and often prepends "your" to it. Currently, this isn't a
problem since there currently are no normal, armor artifacts. If/when any
are introduced, rust_dmg() will need to be addressed.
The patch is for the trunk only. A lot of research was required and I
didn't feel the upside was there for repeating it in the 3.4.3 branch.
This is my final src mod to ensure that a qbuf does not overflow due to
a lengthy named object. These recent patches, coupled with the core yn_function() patch earlier, should make it much rarer for a QBUFSZ
buffer overflow to occur in a window port routine (unless the window
port routine has its own bugs, but that isn't the core's fault).
Do vision_recalc immediately when blasting a door so that all the
subsequent messages for the same blast hitting other things are all
evaluated with the same vision in effect.
- use uwep's oc_wldam value, not chest's oc_wldam value, for computing chance.
oc_wldam has always been 0 for all containers
- the code was broken for a long time, but was masked by the off-by-1 error
in checking the chance, allowing a 1% chance of forcing
- the result is that forcing locks is a lot easier
over the place.
Often they would use
"%ld zorkmid%s", amt, plur(amt)
but not consistently, so some of the hard-coded usage
could result in "1 zorkmids"
This adds the function
currency(long)
to return the name of the currency, either plural
or singular depending on the argument passed to it.
That eliminates the need for the extra %s in the
format string and the use of the plur() macro.
