String definitions were being used with a pointless leading double
quote. This syntax is used only to define strings containing leading
space characters. (You might also use it defensively if you're defining
one string whose contents start with the interpolation of another, and
the latter might interpolate leading space--but that is not the case
here.)
Remove unnecessary leading quotes from string definitions.
* doc/Guidebook.mn: Do it. Also annotate empty strings with comment.
* sys/unix/hints/include/gbdates-post.370: Don't put them back.
https://www.gnu.org/software/groff/manual/groff.html.node/Strings.html
Stop trying to deduce whether the document is being formatted for a
typesetter (a device that can use proportional fonts) or a terminal (a
device that generally can't) by asking the formatter to measure
formatted texts. Instead, use the built-in `n` and `t` conditions that
nroff and troff have supported for this purpose since 1976 at the
latest. All known troff implementations support these.
https://www.gnu.org/software/groff/manual/groff.html.node/Operators-in-Conditionals.html
These *roff control lines were ill-formed. `.fi` is a request to turn
on filling, not a closing bracket for an `if` request (*roff is not a
Bourne shell).
https://www.gnu.org/software/groff/manual/groff.html.node/Conditional-Blocks.html
Further, *roff generally does not accept more than one request per
input line. Exceptions to this rule are the control structuring
requests (`if`, `ie`, `el`, and in GNU troff, `while`, `do` and `nop`).
But here, only one (`do`-nested) request is governed by the `if` anyway.
* doc/Guidebook.mn: Remove workaround, in favor of...
* doc/tmac.n: ...setting automatic hyphenation mode appropriate to
hyphenation systems used by AT&T-descended troffs on the one hand
("suftab") and groff (TeX hyphenation patterns) on the other.
modify results of pull request #977 to target tmac.nh instead.
Guidebook update to trigger the process following pull request 977.
G. Branden Robinson