twoweapon message adjustment
There was a concern that some things resulted in "is not a weapon" when trying to twoweapon, then were subsequently refered to in menus as "weapon in hand." Remove any perceived inconsistency by simply adjusting the first message.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -673,7 +673,8 @@ can_twoweapon()
|
||||
else if (NOT_WEAPON(uwep) || NOT_WEAPON(uswapwep)) {
|
||||
otmp = NOT_WEAPON(uwep) ? uwep : uswapwep;
|
||||
pline("%s %s.", Yname2(otmp),
|
||||
is_plural(otmp) ? "aren't weapons" : "isn't a weapon");
|
||||
is_plural(otmp) ? "aren't suitable weapons"
|
||||
: "isn't a suitable weapon");
|
||||
} else if (bimanual(uwep) || bimanual(uswapwep)) {
|
||||
otmp = bimanual(uwep) ? uwep : uswapwep;
|
||||
pline("%s isn't one-handed.", Yname2(otmp));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user