twoweapon message adjustment
There was a concern that some things resulted in "is not a weapon" when trying to twoweapon, then were subsequently refered to in menus as "weapon in hand." Remove any perceived inconsistency by simply adjusting the first message.
This commit is contained in:
+2
-1
@@ -673,7 +673,8 @@ can_twoweapon()
|
|||||||
else if (NOT_WEAPON(uwep) || NOT_WEAPON(uswapwep)) {
|
else if (NOT_WEAPON(uwep) || NOT_WEAPON(uswapwep)) {
|
||||||
otmp = NOT_WEAPON(uwep) ? uwep : uswapwep;
|
otmp = NOT_WEAPON(uwep) ? uwep : uswapwep;
|
||||||
pline("%s %s.", Yname2(otmp),
|
pline("%s %s.", Yname2(otmp),
|
||||||
is_plural(otmp) ? "aren't weapons" : "isn't a weapon");
|
is_plural(otmp) ? "aren't suitable weapons"
|
||||||
|
: "isn't a suitable weapon");
|
||||||
} else if (bimanual(uwep) || bimanual(uswapwep)) {
|
} else if (bimanual(uwep) || bimanual(uswapwep)) {
|
||||||
otmp = bimanual(uwep) ? uwep : uswapwep;
|
otmp = bimanual(uwep) ? uwep : uswapwep;
|
||||||
pline("%s isn't one-handed.", Yname2(otmp));
|
pline("%s isn't one-handed.", Yname2(otmp));
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user