follow-up comment bit
This commit is contained in:
+4
-4
@@ -3062,10 +3062,10 @@ destroy_arm(struct obj *atmp)
|
|||||||
resistedc = FALSE, resistedsuit = FALSE;
|
resistedc = FALSE, resistedsuit = FALSE;
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Note: if the cloak resisted, then the suit or shirt underneath
|
* Note: if the cloak resisted, then the suit or shirt underneath
|
||||||
* wouldn't be impacted either. Likewise, if the suit resisted,
|
* wouldn't be impacted either. Likewise, if the suit resisted, the
|
||||||
* the shirt underneath wouldn't be impacted. Since there are
|
* shirt underneath wouldn't be impacted. Since there are no artifact
|
||||||
* no artifact cloaks or suits right now, this is unlikely
|
* cloaks or suits right now, this is unlikely to come into effect,
|
||||||
* to come into effect, but should it should behave appropriately.
|
* but it should behave appropriately if/when the situation changes.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((otmp = maybe_destroy_armor(uarmc, atmp, &resistedc)) != 0) {
|
if ((otmp = maybe_destroy_armor(uarmc, atmp, &resistedc)) != 0) {
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user