Issue reported by elunna: the definition of the Mitre of Holiness
specifies that carrying it should confer fire resistance but that
didn't work.
The Mitre's definition (added in 3.1.0) has always included that,
but such a capability had never been implemented. Wearing it didn't
confer fire resistance either--its definition doesn't bother to
specify a 'defend' attribute since the 'carry' one should cover that.
This adds carrying capability for damage types fire, cold, sleep,
disintegration, electrity, poison, acid, and petrification. Fire is
still specified by the Mitre; none of the others are currently used.
Fixes#1362
There are two hardfought code additions that render save and bones files incompatible
with the upstream NetHack-3.7, and that makes testing with hardfought
save and bones files more challenging than it needs to be, when
investigating and troubleshooting bug reports.
Add some unused fields to advance towards achieving save file parity with
hardfought, which is a significant source of play-testing for NetHack-3.7.
1) the elbereth field addition to u_conduct
This adds an unused placeholder field named 'hf_reserved1', at the appropriate
place in u_conduct to achieve struct field parity with the one in use on
hardfought.
2) hardfought adds a field to struct monst:
char former_rank[25]; /* for bones' ghost rank in their former life */
Instead of adding that to every monst, this adds a new mextra struct
named 'former', which currently contains the equivalent 25-character
field called 'rank' which can hold the content that was in the
former_rank[25] field. That way, the field will only be added when it
is needed.
A pull request https://github.com/k21971/NetHack37/pull/2 has been
done on hardfought to do it the same way (untested there as of yet).
Even though NetHack-3.7 does not utilize that information presently,
this will be a further step toward allowing hardfought-generated save
and bones files to be used for troubleshooting, without modification,
on a similar architecture running stock NetHack-3.7 code.
That savefile parity won't be achieved until the after the
hardfought pull-request mentioned above (or equivalent) is merged.
As this change will not be compatible with existing save and bones
files, it will be accompanied with an EDITLEVEL increment.
Tame earth elemental picked up a no_charge object from a shop and moved
it out of the shop, causing "no_charge obj not inside tended shop"
impossible. Non-tame monsters picking up no_charge items cleared that
bit, so make the same happen for pets.
> if (strlen(simpleoname) > BUFSZ - sizeof "the ")
> simpleoname[sizeof "the "] = '\0';
The second line should have been
| simpleoname[strlen(simpleoname) - sizeof "the "] = '\0';
but fixing that isn't adequate. The BUFSZ limit is not valid when
dealing with object names since xname() leaves room for a prefix so
doesn't return the start of a BUFSZ-sized buffer.
Strangely enough, the complaint that caused me to add those two lines
isn't being triggered any more. Some other change at the same time,
perhaps splitting
Strcpy(simpleoname, obufp = the(simpleoname));
into
obufp = the(simpleoname);
Strcpy(simpleoname, obufp);
pacified the analyzer. However, it didn't resolve the valid complaint
that inserting "the " might result in overflow.
I've added a comment about simpleonames(), ansimpleoname(), and
thesimpleoname() about the possible overflow, but I don't think that
such overflow can actually happen when user-applied object name is
being suppressed.
I got confused and thought that this one (actually pair) was more
complicated than it actually is. have_mixed_leadin is used in an
ordinary way, but resetting it to false happens in spots where it
can't be used again. The analyzer complains that the assignments
don't do anything useful.
When testing the analyzer lint fixes for pager.c, I noticed that //
wasn't finding the data.base entry for stairs when examining the up
stairs on level 1. It is labelled "branch stairs up" which doesn't
match "stair*".
This construct triggered several complaints about passing Null to
Strcpy(simpleoname, obufp = the(simpleoname));
Changing that to
obufp = the(simpleoname);
Strcpy(simpleoname, obufp);
prevents it, but the original complaint is bogus and the "fix"
doesn't do anything to deal with Null arguments.
A couple of other changes introduce different code in order to get
different behavior. I updated from llvm-16 to llvm-19 but didn't
eliminate any of the spurious complaints.
Clear "next" boulder so that when pushing a pile of boulders, only
the first message for each of the 2nd, 3rd, &c will be formatted as
"next boulder". If any of them trigger additional messages, those
messages will use normal "boulder".
Commit 1acc2727 helped ensure that the which_armor(mtmp, W_SADDLE)
test at the top of put_saddle_on_mon() wouldn't lead to an obj
leak.
This commit covers off the adjacent can_saddle() test in
put_saddle_on_mon(), because if that failed, it could also lead
to a memory leak of the saddle obj passed by the caller.
- have put_saddle_on_mon() create and use its own saddle obj
if a NULL saddle obj is passed, instead of having to do that
in the caller.
- where an existing saddle obj needs to be passed from the caller,
ensure that the caller has done its own can_saddle(mon) check prior
to calling put_saddle_on_mon(), so that the can_saddle() test
in put_saddle_on_mon() won't fail.
- lastly, add an impossible() to put_saddle_on_mon() to catch
a failure when a saddle obj is passed from the caller and either
test has failed, just in case. That should not happen with any of
the existing cases now, but it will provide some bullet-proofing
for new code, new callers.
makemon() has a 1% chance to bestow a worn saddle when creating any
rideable monster. If that chance kicked in on a knight's starting
pony, an extra saddle would end up being created but not worn nor
in inventory nor on floor so not be freed when the game ended.
That 1% chance also overrode saddle suppression for pauper knights.
There wouldn't be any extra saddle but their pony could start with
one, against intent.
Have makedog() (which is only used for starting pet) tell makemon()
to suppress inventory when creating the initial pet.
Overzealous change yesterday. For use_defensive(), the unicorn
horn case already has guards for Null item and the added one
issues bogus panic() when a unicorn or ki-rin uses its own horn.
In file included from ../include/config.h:723:0,
from ../include/hack.h:10,
from files.c:8:
../include/global.h:519:24: error: expected ')' before '<=' token
#define unctrl(c) ((c) <= C('z') ? (0x60 | (c)) : (c))
^
../lib/pdcursesmod/curses.h:1686:16: note: in expansion of macro 'unctrl'
PDCEX char *unctrl(chtype);
^~~~~~
Define a macro NH_C to provide a shorter & simpler way to test for
which C standard the build is being carried out under (c99 or c23).
NH_C > 202300L Being compiled under C23 or greater
NH_C > 199900L Being compiled under C99 or greater
NH_C > 198900L Being compiled under C89 or greater,
or C std could not be determined.
While NetHack only requires c99, we've been taking advantage
of some c23 features (attributes), if they are available,
to allow the use of ATTRNORETURN/NORETURN and FALLTHROUGH on
compilers other than gcc.
Also add some comment documentation to tradstdc.h about NetHack's
use of c99.
The sys/unix/Makefile.top change overcomes a warning in the
Makefile-generated nhlua.h. That warning arises under some compilers
that rely on attribute [[noreturn]] ahead of a declaration
(NetHack macro ATTRNORETURN), rather than the trailing gcc
__attribute((noreturn)) (NetHack macro NORETURN). The sed command
is modified to include ATTRNORETURN at the start of the declaration
in addition to the NORETURN at the end of the declaration, in the
generated file. That's the same combination that's used for the
declaration of other functions that don't return.
