github pull request #228 commentary follows:
This adds a boolean option, autounlock, defaulting to true. When this is
set to TRUE, messages stating that some door or container is locked are
automatically followed by a prompt asking if you would like to unlock
it, if you are carrying an unlocking tool (key, lock pick, or credit
card).
Architecturally, this extends the pick_lock function to take three
additional arguments (door coordinates or a box on the ground you are
autounlocking).
Because this adds a new field to struct flag, this is not a
save-compatible change. I have not adjusted EDITLEVEL or
VERSION_COMPATIBILITY, though.
The code that selects an unlocking tool will always look first for a
skeleton key, then a lock pick, then a credit card. Since curses, rust,
and other attributes don't really have an effect on the viability of the
unlocking device, it didn't seem to warrant making a more complex
function for that.
closes#228
This adds a boolean option, autounlock, defaulting to true. When this is
set to TRUE, messages stating that some door or container is locked are
automatically followed by a prompt asking if you would like to unlock
it, if you are carrying an unlocking tool (key, lock pick, or credit
card).
Architecturally, this extends the pick_lock function to take three
additional arguments (door coordinates or a box on the ground you are
autounlocking).
Because this adds a new field to struct flag, this is not a
save-compatible change. I have not adjusted EDITLEVEL or
VERSION_COMPATIBILITY, though.
The code that selects an unlocking tool will always look first for a
skeleton key, then a lock pick, then a credit card. Since curses, rust,
and other attributes don't really have an effect on the viability of the
unlocking device, it didn't seem to warrant making a more complex
function for that.
The pull request #226 commentary follows:
One major limitation of the autopickup exception system is that you can't
define an exception from an exception, despite both menucolors and msgtypes
prioritizing rules based on the order they are defined in .nethackrc. This
is because the "always pickup" and "never pickup" exceptions are tracked in
different lists, and at runtime, when the player steps over an object, the
game checks these lists seperately, with "never pickup" taking precedence.
This means that if you want to pick up some but not all items matching a
given expression, you may need to write a long and kludgy list of regexes
to get the behavior you want.
I've edited the autopickup exception code to remove this necessity: now
the exceptions are stored in one list, and conflicts between them are
resolved based on their relative position in that list. Whether an
exception was inclusive or exclusive was already tracked individually;
I don't know why they were stored separately in the first place. This
edit makes the system both more convenient and more consistent with the
semantics of menucolors and msgtypes.
With these changes, the 33 autopickup exception rules in the wiki article
linked above may be replaced with the following 7 much simpler rules for
the exact same effect:
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION=">.* corpse.*"
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION="<.* newt corpse.*"
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION="<.* lichen corpse.*"
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION="<.* lizard corpse.*"
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION="<.* floating eye corpse.*"
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION="<.* wraith corpse.*
AUTOPICKUP_EXCEPTION=">.*\>.*"
closes#226
Report stated:
"Poes deliberately slither onto a polymorph trap!" ... it's only one cat, er,
black naga. Why does the parser treat the name as plural? There are lots of
singular words and names that end in -s or -es!
H9249 1780
Reported directly to devteam rather than via the web contact form:
throwing wielded aklys while swallowed would hit the engulfer and
return to the hero's hand but leave a stale 'thrownobj' pointer if
the monster survived. Under usual circumstances, throwing anything
else or throwing the aklys again when not engulfed would clear that
pointer, putting things back to normal. However, killing any engulfer
with the same weapon would try to add it to engulfer's inventory to
be dropped as it died. If the killing blow was via melee rather than
another throw, the object in question would still be in hero's
inventory instead of free, hence panic.
The initial returning-aklys implementation shared Mjollnir's code
which doesn't have this issue. This reverts from having attached
aklys always returning successfully when thrown while swallowed to
Mjollnir's 99% chance of return and 99% to be caught when it does
come back. (That was already the case if the engulfer was killed by
the throw, where hero wasn't swallowed anymore after the damage was
inflicted.)
Fixes#221
Routine unfixeable_trouble_count() is used for both applying a unicorn
horn (possibly internally via #monster if poly'd into a unicorn) and
drinking a blessed potion of restore ability. For the latter case, it
always gave the wrong answer (unless the hero happened to be all of
Sick and Stunned and Confused and Hallucinating and Vomiting and Deaf).
Since the actual count wasn't used to decide whether hero felt "great"
or just "good", having any of those conditions would hide the problem.
Have the 'menucolors' option control menu color pattern matching
(instead of curses-specific 'guicolor') for all menus, not just for
the persistent inventory window.
Subject was "display crash while in curses mode". Restoring with
perm_invent set in config file or NETHACKOPTIONS when the save was
made while swallowed (regardless of perm_invent at that time) resulted
in a crash when invalid u.ustuck was referenced before restoration had
done its pointer fixups.
init_nhwindows() is called with perm_invent On;
restgamestate() temporarily turns it Off (3.6.2 restore hack);
if/when update_inventory() gets called, curses notices that the
persistent window has been disabled so it tears down all its windows
in order to redraw the screen without that one;
docrt() sees non-Null u.ustuck and calls swallowed();
swallowed() tries to use the value of that pointer rather than just
Null/non-Null but the value is from the previous game session, not
valid for the current session;
crash.
Make yet another attempt to prevent update_inventory() from being
called during restore. curses won't try to redraw and the crash
won't happen. But the invalid pointer is still lurking (until an
eventual fixup later during restore).
An earlier fix for update_inventory() during restore actually handled
this problem (for the most common trigger, setworn(), but not in
general), so the 3.6.2 behavior is a regression.
Add the contributed code that checks for attempting to start a
duplicate timer. It's based on a comment which must have been there
at least 25 years and doesn't solve any known problems, but it is
conceptually similar to the large amount of sanity checking which has
gone into 3.6.x.
It didn't work as is because it was comparing two unions with '=='.
I don't know offhand whether C++ supports that but C doesn't (through
C11 at least; don't know about C17). The union ('anything') is simple
enough that two instances can be compared without jumping through hoops.
I've also added another check for timer 'kind' (level, object, monster,
or global).
phase_of_moon and friday_13th determined using rn2() instead of local
time if fuzzing. Don't reseed using init_random() if fuzzing. Allow
set_random to be called outside of hacklib. rn2_on_display_rng uses
rn2 if fuzzing so that we have a single source of random that we can
ensure is reproducible. Implement rul() that returns a random unsigned
long. Fix bug in fuzzer handling of ntposkey which would cause us to use
unitialized values for x and y. Added command line arguments to allow
auto starting and stopping of fuzzer. Add a logging facility for the
fuzzer to use to record activity. Added some scripts used to automate
fuzzer testing on windows.
_snprintf and snprintf have one very important semantic difference.
_snprintf does NOT add terminating null character when the buffer limit
is reached while snprintf guarantees a terminating null character. It
was a mistake to make this naming change hiding the fact that the
semantics don't match what the developer might expect.
