Reduce verbosity for monsters with multiple attacks who "swing wildly
at you and miss" or "miss your displaced image" due to their confusion or
your invisibility or displacement. It's aggravating to sit through that
three times for claw/claw/bite or swing/swing/kick when those longer
descriptions of why such missing happened guarantee multiple --More--
prompts. (Can't simply use Norep() to deal with this because wildmiss()
varies its messages.)
This makes monsters marginally smarter--independent of their defined
intelligence levels--by skipping their remaining attacks when the first
turns out to be targetted at nothing. The exception is for monsters with
both melee and spell attacks; they'll keep going in case they end up
choosing a spell which doesn't need a target location. (It's rather ironic
that the most intelligent monsters are the ones who'll foolishly continue
swinging at thin air. This could be improved by forcing then to skip ahead
to their spell attack.) Exploding monsters aren't affected because they
don't have multiple attacks. Offhand I can't think of any other situation
where a wild miss on the first of N attacks could still yield a successful
result on any of the other N-1 actions.
Monsters attempting ranged attacks who get multiple shots (due to
multiple weapon attacks per turn rather than to multi-shot volley during
a single attack) will end up conserving ammo when they stop after seeing
that the first shot didn't find a target. Note that trying to attack you
but accidentally attacking some other target isn't affected since that
doesn't yield the wild miss outcome. Intelligent monsters probably ought
to recognize that their attack against you ended up hitting someone else
and refrain from repeating that mistake N-1 more times. Whether feedback
from that ought to carry over to their next turn is not so clear cut.
702060c4de