We have a struct called mkroom and a function called mkroom()
so c++ complains about the mkroom() function hiding the
initializer for the struct.
Similarly, we have a struct called attack and a function
called attack().
There may be a more elegant way of eliminating those two
warnings, but renaming mkroom() to do_mkroom() and
attack() to do_attack() was straightforward enough.
Whitelist all the verified existing triggers:
makedefs.c: In function ‘name_file’
attrib.c: one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
cmd.c: In function ‘extcmd_via_menu’
cmd.c: In function ‘wiz_levltyp_legend’
do.c: In function ‘goto_level’
do_name.c: In function ‘coord_desc’
dungeon.c: In function ‘overview_stats’
eat.c: one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
end.c: one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
engrave.c: In function ‘engr_stats’
hack:c one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
hacklib.c: one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
insight.c: one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
invent.c: In function ‘let_to_name’
light.c: In function ‘light_stats’
mhitm.c: In function ‘missmm’
options.c: In function ‘handler_symset’
options.c: In function ‘basic_menu_colors’
options.c: In function ‘optfn_o_autopickup_exceptions’
options.c: In function ‘optfn_o_menu_colors’
options.c: In function ‘optfn_o_message_types’
options.c: In function ‘optfn_o_status_cond’
options.c: In function ‘optfn_o_status_hilites’
options.c: In function ‘doset’
options.c: In function ‘doset_add_menu’
options.c: In function ‘show_menu_controls’
options.c: In function ‘handle_add_list_remove’
pager.c: In function ‘do_supplemental_info’
pager.c: In function ‘dohelp’
region.c: In function ‘region_stats’
rumors.c: sscanf usage
sounds.c: In function ‘domonnoise’
spell.c: In function ‘dospellmenu’
timeout.c: In function ‘timer_stats’
topten.c: In function ‘outentry’, fscanf, sscanf, fprintf usage
windows.c: In function ‘genl_status_update’
zap.c: one compiler balks at a ? b : c for fmtstring
win/curses/cursstat.c: In function ‘curses_status_update’
win/tty/wintty.c: In function ‘tty_status_update’
win/win32/mswproc.c: In function ‘mswin_status_update’
Note: the line numbers referenced in the warning messages below are not in sync
with the NetHack-3.7 branch and should be disregarded
files.c: In function 'get_saved_games':
files.c:1168:9: warning: unused variable 'n' [-Wunused-variable]
1168 | int n, j = 0;
| ^
mhitm.c: In function 'mdamagem':
mhitm.c:843:13: warning: variable 'cancelled' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
843 | boolean cancelled;
| ^~~~~~~~~
mhitu.c: In function 'hitmu':
mhitu.c:943:9: warning: variable 'uncancelled' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
943 | int uncancelled;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
mklev.c: In function 'place_branch':
mklev.c:1214:20: warning: variable 'br_room' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
1214 | struct mkroom *br_room;
| ^~~~~~~
monmove.c: In function 'm_move':
monmove.c:874:43: warning: variable 'doorbuster' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
874 | boolean can_open = 0, can_unlock = 0, doorbuster = 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
Gcc 9 has become more vocal with sprintf buffer overflow
checking. Remove these sprintf warnings by changing the
offending calls to a snprintf wrapper that will explicitly
check the result.
Be prepared for life-saving to contradict "<mon> falls to pieces".
Purely hypothetically at present (with no plans to change) since
golems don't benefit from amulets of life-saving.
This tries to fix the problem of the extra message when a tame
golem is completely destroyed (paper or straw golem burned, iron
golem rusted, wood or leather golem rotted) being issued at odd
times. I basically punted on the visibility aspect since the
original logic was strange: you had to be able to see both the
attacker's and defender's spots and at least one of those two
monsters. Now mon-attacks-mon visibility requires that you be
able to see one of the two and if you don't see both, the unseen
one will be referred to as "it". The "may the iron golem rust
in peace" message is independent of that and may be displayed
after "you have a sad feeling", but now that's intentional and
will refer to an unseen pet by name or monster type, not "it".
This needs a lot of testing and hasn't attempted to address
issue #402: only some attacks that should compeletely destroy
a golem actually do so. (So a hit by fire elemental against a
paper golem does, but passive fire counterattack when a paper
golem hits a fire elemental doesn't, nor does a wand of fire
or being hit by Firebrand.)
Fixes#401
When a zombie (or lich) kills a monster in melee without a weapon,
the monster can rise few turns later as a zombie.
The only creatures that can be zombified are ones that actually have
a zombie counterpart monster. A zombie cannot turn a jackal into
a zombie, for instance. But it could turn a shopkeeper into a human
zombie, or a dwarf king into a dwarf zombie.
Zombies will fight with monsters that can be turned into zombies.
Originally this was a SliceHack feature, but this is based on xNetHack
version of it, with some modifications.
... on the floor, in monster inventory, and in hero's inventory.
Items in your inventory being ignited produce a message even if you're
blind - you can see the lit-state by viewing inventory anyway, so just
give player the message.
(via xNetHack)
This commit is intended to fix the bug where a pet will get fixated on
an unmoving monster and stop moving itself. I described the cause in the
github issue; the gist is that the pet AI chooses the unmoving monster
as its ranged target, doesn't do anything when it calls mattackm
(because it doesn't have ranged attacks), then returns a value
indicating it didn't move and can't take further actions.
I initially implemented a fix that refactored mattackm to distinguish
between "attacker missed" and "attacker did nothing", which the pet AI
could then use to determine whether the pet could continue doing things.
But then I realized that if mattackm is called with non-adjacent
monsters, a return of MM_MISS more or less unambiguously indicates that
the attacker did nothing (because the ranged functions it calls like
breamm don't actually check to see whether the target was hit, just
whether the monster initiated the attack.) So, this only really needed
to check whether mattackm returned with MM_MISS.
I also found a probable bug in mattackm, in that the thrwmm call isn't
treated the same as breamm or spitmm. In the latter two, mattackm
returns MM_HIT even though it doesn't check whether the ranged attack
actually hit its target. But there was no logic doing the same for
thrwmm, so this commit also adds that. (Otherwise, a pet could possibly
use a ranged weapon attack and then get to keep moving on its turn.)
