From a bug report, using stone to flesh to
reanimate a petrified monster who was carrying gold (in his case, it was
a shopkeeper) resulted in gold in the monster's inventory. Somehow it was
also being duplicated in the mgold field--I didn't try to figure that part
out--so killing the monster produced double gold. More significantly,
probing such a monster prior to killing it caused a panic when the monster
inventory was being massaged for formatting.
Fix is trivial: use a routine which knows about special handling for
gold when transferring statue contents to resurrected monster. Both aspects
of the problem only occurred for the !GOLDOBJ configuration (which is our
default). However, any objects which confer something special when simply
being carried would have also been misbehaving--automagic animation of
cursed figurines is the only applicable situation; too rare for anyone to
have noticed.
Implement the suggestion that Fire Brand avoids damage from rust traps
by boiling away the water. Rather than making this be trap-specific, it
applies to all types of erosion which go through erode_obj(). That includes
hitting rust monsters but not dipping into potions or fountains, nor falling
into moats. And it doesn't provide 100% protection, just a high chance of
avoiding rust damage. Also, Frost Brand gets similar protection by freezing.
The message handling needed some rewriting for the branch version.
That compiles ok but hasn't been tested. It would have been simpler just to
move Yobjnam2() over even if nothing else was changed to use it yet....
While wearing EotO, ";" and selecting a monster behind a wall would display
"normal vision" as well as "astral vision". This is because cansee() gets
set for things seen via astral vision. However, couldsee() is only set for
things that could be seen normally, so check both values.
When confused remove curse acts upon an object to randomly bless or
curse it, clear the bknown flag. Do this for all objects which get subjected
to the effect, even ones which are already blessed or cursed and hence don't
change state.
<Someone> reported that when levitating and blind, he was getting
"You float over the hole" without it showing up on the map. Easiest way
to reproduce: zap a wand of digging downwards while levitating blind,
move off the spot and back over it.
Make sure that all traps created by the player are mapped. For other
traps, it was about 50:50 whether the trap triggering message yields enough
information to warrant forcibly mapping the trap when blind.
A few weeks ago someone in the newsgroup posted how he got an intrinsic
value for increased damage up to something like +74 via eating rings (on his
way to killing the Riders a zillion times for maximum score--he wanted to be
sure to kill them in a single hit each time so that his use of keystroke
macros wouldn't get out of sync by extended combat). Make it moderately
difficult to get beyond +20 and impossible to get past +40 for corresponding
attribute when eating rings of increase damage, increase accuracy, and
protection. Since you could also wear a pair of +7 rings you can still get
an awfully high total, but it won't be unlimited any more and most people
willing and able to go to such extreme lengths would undoubtedly prefer to
be wearing other types of rings.
From the newsgroup: non-cursed dunce cap or helm of opposite alignment
which would glow black and become cursed if worn by the hero wasn't doing
the same when worn by a monster. Fixing this gives players a new way to
recognize bad hats--drop on altar, then drop in front of approaching goblin
or other wimpy monster capable of wearing armor--but I think that's fair.
Since helms of opposite alignment are usually already cursed it won't make
much difference for them; most players seem to avoid all conical hats so it
won't make much difference for dunce caps either.
When 3.4.0 added the shop price to inventory display of unpaid items,
it resulted in showing that price twice if you used the `I u' command while
carrying just one unpaid object.
k - a potion of object detection (unpaid, 150 zorkmids) 150 zorkmids
With two or more unpaid objects it uses a menu style display and explicitly
suppresses "(unpaid, N zorkmids)" from the inventory formatting. Do the
same suppression when there's one item.
k - a potion of object detection 150 zorkmids
Various actions (potion dilution, igniting candles or oil, dulling a
weapon by engraving) on an unpaid object can modify it in such a way that
a shopkeeper will force the hero to buy it. bill_dummy_object() is used
to make a copy for the shop bill; play continues with the modified item
now owned by the player. bill_dummy_object() was setting the no_charge
flag unconditionally on the modified object but the flag shouldn't be set
for items in inventory. It was possible to drop the object and sell it,
pick it back up for free due to that flag setting, then drop it and sell
it again. One easy way to reproduce is to zap yourself with a wand of
cancellation while carrying unpaid positively enchanted armor or weapon.
The no_charge flag gets cleared when you pick something up off the
floor or take it out of a container, so this sell-it-again case would only
repeat once. Selling a dropped item ought to clear the flag, but my head
is still spinning after looking at the shop code to see about implementing
that. This fix just prevents bill_dummy_object() from mis-setting the
flag in the first place; sellobj() still can't fix it up after the fact.
From a bug report, it is possible for the hero to
appear embedded in the wall after destroying the drawbridge. This is because
The variable "lev1", which was the entity's location, was being referenced
after e_died, but e_died can change the entity's location. So, as <Someone>
suggested, refer to the current location directly.
While auditing nomul() I noticed unconscious() treats (multi < 0 && !nomovemsg)
as unconscious. This explains the behavior in M29 (unconscious message
while performing #turn). I checked all the places with this combination,
and found a few that did not appear to fall under the "unconscious" category.
Most I changed to use You_can_move_again to ensure the same display w/o the
unconscious behavior. Also:
- found another string that unconscious() should have considered
- vomit() now sets nomovemsg, one caller was also doing this redundantly
- vomiting_dialogue() was calling stop_occupation() after vomit(), which can
reset multi. I reversed the order and removed a doubly-redundant nomul call.
tele() still has a problem: some cases where multi < 0 should probably take
a branch like the unconscious() branch but with a different message.
doturn()'s behavior - turn then wait - is also less than perfect, but I
think this is a known problem.
Finally apply the patch sent by <Someone> in 11/2003 for slashem-Bugs-799278,
updated to match the current code and handle additional cases. The fix
is brute force: always ensure nomovemsg is set when nomul is called with
a negative value. I also scanned the code for places manually setting
multi negative, they all set nomovemsg. It would be nice to have a function
that did the right thing, but there are several special cases and I was
not feeling creative.
From the newsgroup: player offered the Amulet with a pet adjacent
to his character, and instead of getting "You and Fido ascended" he got
"Fido is still eating" followed by "You ascended". Make all adjacent pets
eligible to accompany an ascension even when they're in circumstances where
they'd be prevented from coming along on a normal level change.
When testing drawbridge stuff recently I ended up with an unseen
monster who evidently cast the aggravation spell repeatedly, yielding a
steady stream of "you feel that monsters are aware of your presence"
messages. This patch makes monsters tend to avoid repeating that spell
once everyone on the level has already been woken up. It also extends
the spell effect so that it will wake monsters like quest nemesis and the
Wizard who ordinarily wait until you get close before they become active.
<Someone> reported: You kill it! A potion of invisibility shatters!
Change the rule in hero_breaks() to avoid giving info for things out of
sight, except when from_invent is set, to preserve desired behavior.
Several places were not using safe_qbuf or anything equivalent to avoid
overflowing a QBUFSZ buffer. Add more uses plus one special case. For
the current max lengths returned by xname(), I think this is
sufficient. This addresses a reported buffer overflow for a
"thoroughly rusty thoroughly corroded helm of opposite alignment", plus more.
Suppress "Mr" or "Ms" title for shopkeepers when they're going by a
first name rather than a surname. The bug report was for Izchak, but it
would have happened with the two last resort names (which I've never seen
in actual use) and for the "hippie names" used in post-3.4.x health food
shops. I have not attempted to specify gender for those, just flagged
them as first names. This prepends a prefix character to the name string
(see comment in shknam.c) to specify gender and/or first name vs surname.
Shop items stolen or destroyed without being in inventory were handled
inconsistently compared to simply picking up unpaid items because different
criteria got used to decide whether the shk cares about something. Last
December a hack to deal with this for container contents was introduced but
that left the problem for ordinary items. This patch attempts to address
it by using a common check for theft and for pickup's add-to-bill.
It hasn't had nearly enough testing and I won't be very surprised if
one or more new obscure shop bugs have now come into being, but perhaps
they'll at least be consistent bugs as far as shop billing is concerned....
Neither nymphs nor monkeys can steal a ring worn underneath gloves
since they can't see them. If such rings are randomly targetted, try to
take gloves instead.
Succubi trying to take worn ring of adornment will attempt to take
off worn gloves first. (Presumeably they can sense magic rings hidden
beneath gloves better than nymphs can; they're about to try to take all
worn armor off anyway....) If the glove removal fails, ring theft will
too. Likewise for incubi, remove gloves before trying to force the hero
to put on ring of adornment.
At the moment succubi and incubi can't remove gloves which are
blocked by a welded weapon, but they can manipulate rings then if there
aren't any gloves involved. I don't think that's right. The latter is
nymph-like and could be attributed to magic, but if that's the case why
aren't they able to remove gloves from under cursed weapons too?
Prevent monkeys from stealing any ring which the hero can't remove due
to it being stuck inside the grip of a cursed weapon. Nymphs can still do
so though. From a bug report.
Fix the two problems that <Someone> reported about stale pointer use
after a bag of holding has exploded. use_container() passed the wrong
variable for quantity when calling useupf(), and doapply() had no way to
tell if the object being used had been destroyed so could use an invalid
pointer when checking for speaking artifact. The fix for the latter is
much simpler than what <Someone> suggested.
Someone in the newsgroup mentioned that there is no warning from blessed
food detection if you attempt to eat a tin of Medusa meat. touch_petrifies()
isn't enough to catch that. A warning was given about Medusa's corpse, but
only if you lacked poison resistance. Eating a tainted Medusa corpse had a
similar problem; the check to override food poisoning so that petrification
takes effect missed it. This makes the petrification checks be consistent,
including hypothetical case of Medusa egg.
When a wish request for "<foo> armor" fails to match anything, check
whether it matches "<foo> mail" before resorting to selecting a random piece
of armor. Most of the suits are named "mail", and while I don't think many
people will ask for "ring armor", I do think that "crystal plate armor" and
"gray dragon scale armor" are sometimes tried.
This also greatly simplifies the handling for spelling variant "armour"
by rewriting it to "armor". Unfortunately "grey" vs "gray" can't be handled
the same way since both spellings are used by the program.
A user recently complained that he started an activity such as
searching and specified a repeat count, right after getting--and not
realizing the significance of--the first message in the countdown
sequence for turning into stone. He suggested that subsequent messages
interrupt multi-turn activity so that the player has a chance to do
something to prevent imminent death. This implements that, with the
added wrinkle that it won't interrupt if the activity is something that
might save the character's life: attempting to eat a tin that is either
sure to help (if ID'd as food that cures stoning) or a desparate gamble
(if unID'd). Some hooks for similar behavior for other conditions like
turning into slime are included, although no tins can help for anything
other than petrification so far.
Shouldn't fatal illness have an end-is-near countdown too?
Bug Report:
>> Status of the doppelganger (neutral): Level 13 HP 1433(1433) AC 5.
>> [See the HPs!! ]
Michael:
> I used a debugger and traced this massive hit point growth
> to this line in mon.c, function newcham(). (I watched the mhp
> jump from 58 to 567 with this one calculation!
>> Ah, I see that this problem is fixed in the trunk but still present in
>> the branch. This seems serious/abusive enough to warrant the fix to be
>> applied to the branch too, doesn't it?
Pat:
> I don't think it's all that important but you're welcome to
> extract and adapt the patch if you like.
From a bug report:
> If the Summon Nasties monster spell gates in two minions instead of one,
> the message still says "A monster appears from nowhere!"
The code wasn't counting any summoned monsters who had an opposite alignment
to the summoner. It also assumed that the 10% chance for demon summoning
in Gehennom always yielded exactly one monster even though that can produce
zero or more than one.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:07:14 +1300, <email deleted> wrote:
> Adding one of several candles to a candelabrum which already has six
> gives an ungrammatical message.
<Someone> wrote:
>> If the previous character was non-neutral, the unicorn would have
>> started off as hostile. When a bones file is loaded, I don't think
>> hostiles are made non-hostile, although the reverse is certainly true
>> (pets of the deceased are usually hostile).
>
> In the general case, they are, or rather their hostility is
> re-evaluated with respect to the new character; see the peace_minded()
> call in getlev(). However, co-aligned unicorns always being created
> peaceful is a special case in makemon(), _not_ part of peace_minded(),
> so they'd just have the usual chance of being made peaceful or not
> depending on alignment strength, as for any other co-aligned monster
> not explicitly declared always peaceful or always hostile.
<Someone> wrote:
> The "/* Fix up the quest nemesis */" code in role_init()
> adds M3_WAITFORU but _doesn't_ remove M3_CLOSE;
> since the Master of Thieves as the Rogue Quest Leader is
> defined with that flag, he keeps it when acting as the Tourist
> Quest Nemesis. Thus, when STRAT_WAITFORU
> is cleared by your actions, STRAT_CLOSE may stay in
> place making him stay meditating when another Nemesis
> wouldn't.
<email deleted> wrote on Friday, December 10, 2004:
> I was in a barracks with the soldiers sleeping. I started fighting one soldier
> and threw a potion of acid on him. I got the "The soldier shrieks in pain!"
> message, but none of the other soldiers in the barracks woke up.
Fix for first issue reported in this bug report:
<email deleted>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 7:13 AM
Subject: Two wrong messages
I would like to report two cosmetic issues:
1. "its gaze is reflected by the invisible [pet]'s shield."
Wrong capitalization.
2. The message given when decapicating an ettin {,zombie} with the Vorpal
Blade fails to mention the second head. This could be pretty tricky to
fix, but, per <Someone>'s suggestion, the easiest explanation would be
to say that the blade's wielder cuts off both heads at once.
The patch would look similar to:
*dmgptr = 2 * mdef->mhp + FATAL_DAMAGE_MODIFIER;
> if(mdef->data==&mons[PM_ETTIN]
> ||mdef->data==&mons[PM_ETTIN_ZOMBIE)
> pline("%s goes through both necks of %s at once like butter!",
> wepdesc, mon_nam(mdef));
> else
pline(behead_msg[rn2(SIZE(behead_msg))],
wepdesc, mon_nam(mdef));
otmp->dknown = TRUE;
(and the same for youdefend)
Add the extra feedback suggested by <Someone> so that being blinded
by moving into a stinking cloud is explicitly pointed out to the user. It
makes things more verbose but seems reasonable. You get blinded for 1 turn
with every step, so the message gets repeated each time too, but since you
also get a choking or coughing message on each step it's only a modest
increase in the overall verbosity.
From a bug report: when a black light explodes and triggers
hallucination, its own monster symbol--or warning marker for same--could
be seen changing. Since nothing is left after it explodes, you shouldn't
hallucinate anything at its location. Fix by killing it off (so removing
it from the map) before initiating Hallucination.
The same occurred for fountains and drinking surrounding water while
underwater.
I also added a !Levitation check for sinks, like already exists for
fountains. I cannot believe sinks are taller than an altar, and if you
can't pick up stuff from an alter while levitation, it stands to reason you
cannot drink from a sink then either.
<Someone> reported that riding a steed into a magic portal can
give "steed is still eating" message, feedback normally used to explain why
you can't go down stairs. Rather than preventing portals from activating
in that situation, just force the meal to be finished in order to suppress
the message. Proper fix is probably to prevent all steed movement while
eating, but that would most likely result in no one ever riding again.
Fix the wizard mode crash From a bug report. Move the WIZKIT
message suppression to a lower level instead of trying to guard against
present and future pline() calls in the wishing code. The way that was
being handling wasn't suitable for dealing with quest feedback.
This also includes a couple of additional wishing synonyms.
Someone in the newsgroup expressed surprise that he didn't get any
special message after surviving the eating of a cockatrice corpse. Combine
the cliche that unconventional meat inevitably tastes like chicken with
the mythology that cockatrices are a bizarre hybrid of chicken and reptile
(or whatever). This will give a message about tasting like chicken for
corpses or smelling like chicken for tins when the hero has petrification
resistance (poly'd into a xorn, for instance) or is hallucinating.
A user reported that when breaking potions inside a box in a shop, he
wasn't charged for them. The code was calling stolen_value() as intended,
but that routine only charged for types of items which the shop normally
carries. That meant that breaking the contents of a box in a general
store would charge for them but doing so in a tool shop would, not even
though the tool shopkeeper would gladly sell such things when you picked
them up instead of causing them to go away.
When fixing this, I noticed that stolen_value() was only charging
for single items. Most of the time that was right, because throwing and
kicking things always split one off, but there are cases (such as zapping
a wand of teleportation at shop goods) where an entire stack gets stolen
as a group. This makes stolen_value() handle all quantities.
Eggs thrown straight up which don't splatter on the ceiling yield
"you've got it all over your face", so wearing a helmet shouldn't protect
against petrification from cockatrice eggs in that situation. This was
part of my delayed helm vs hat stuff; I can't remember whether it was done
before or after this same issue came up in the newsgroup.
Something from <Someone>'s list: some messages have hardcoded references
to "helmet" which sound strange when the character is wearing a hat or cap.
helm_simple_name() is comparable to the existing cloak_simple_name(). It
returns "helm" or "hat" depending upon whether the helmet provides the
same protection that yields the assorted repetitions of "fortunately,
you are wearing a hard helmet". This choice ends up categorizing elven
leather helm as a hat (which I think is ok given that its undiscovered
description is "leather hat"), contrary to <Someone>'s suggestion that the
distinction be made based on whether the helmet was made of cloth.
I started on this a year and a half ago but didn't commit it.
Unfortunately I don't remember why and haven't done any significant
additional work now--just recovered from some intervening bit rot and
confirmed that the patch as is seems to be working ok (in the trunk; the
branch side has not been tested). I suspect that I meant to look for
additional helmet messages which could benefit from conditional headgear
description. (Those "hard helmet" ones don't need it, although they
should perhaps be moved into a common routine instead of being replicated.)
